![max msp trial max msp trial](https://mac-cdn.softpedia.com/screenshots/Max-MSP_7.png)
To test the hypotheses regarding task-related asymmetries, we designed duets such that pianists had: (1) a starting or joining role and (2) a similar or dissimilar musical part compared to their co-performer, with respect to pitch range and melodic contour. Here, we examined how two pianists performed duets while hearing each other’s auditory outcomes with an ATL of 10, 20, or 40 ms. Thus, we are interested in how musicians collectively adapt to a given latency and how such adaptation patterns vary with their task-related and person-related asymmetries.
![max msp trial max msp trial](https://static.packt-cdn.com/products/9781849699716/graphics/9716OT_07_03.jpg)
Previous work has shown that longer ATLs slow the average tempo in ensemble performance, and that asymmetric co-actor roles and empathy-related traits affect coordination patterns in joint action. Acoustic transmission latency (ATL) between players is substantially longer for networked music performance (NMP) compared to traditional in-person spaces where musicians can easily adapt. Musical ensemble performance is unique because interaction integrity critically depends on the timing between each performer’s actions and when their acoustic outcomes arrive. Today’s audio, visual, and internet technologies allow people to interact despite physical distances, for casual conversation, group workouts, or musical performance. 2Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, Untied States.1Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics, Department of Music, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.Wright 1, Chris Chafe 1,2 and Takako Fujioka 1,2 The Evidence and Deposition seminar is available with our Online Training subscription.Auriel Washburn 1*, Matthew J.
Max msp trial how to#
The attorneys discuss management of this situation and how to ensure that you get the witness you want once he’s left the room. Linda begins a deposition of a “professional witness,” but as soon as she begins to draw out his status, opposing counsel interrupts and then calls the deposition off. The focus of the scenario is on management of the deposition, dealing with opposing counsel, when to contact the judge, getting non-verbal conduct on the record and remedies for OC obstruction. Thad attempts to depose a witness, but Max as opposing counsel makes it impossible for him to proceed. Day 1 Wrap Up:ĭay 1 closes with a discussion of resources for researching the note and Q & A Deposition Overview:ĭay 2 opens with a deposition overview, including preparation for the deposition, video-taping versus transcripts (or both), back-up recording, objections, the mechanics of the deposition and “must ask” questions. After commentary from the Judge and attorneys on this scenario, it’s replayed to address issues not raised during the first run-through, including MERS and the use of an expert witness on securitization. The same case described in Vignette # 1 is escalated and Thad Bartholow and Mark Malone argue standing, business records issues and what constitutes an “other qualified person” for purposes of introducing those records. He and debtors’ attorney Linda Tirelli argue standing and jurisdictional issues. With Judge Bridges presiding, Max appears seeking to quash a subpoena to a third party witness.
Max msp trial trial#
The discussion includes advice on how to courteously educate your judge, preparation, tracking of exhibits, the most effective presentation for objections, authentication, leading questions, judicial notice and admissions, business records, expert testimony, trial depositions and more. The seminar opens with a detailed evidence presentation by Judge Bridges. Donald Bridges, the event featured demonstrations and critiques from three of the Boot Camp’s most successful graduates: Mark Malone, Thad Bartholow and Linda Tirelli.